.

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Absolutism and Democracy

What would happen if you got two different governments going head to head, fighting to feel who is better? What if those two governments were majority rule and authoritarianism? In the Seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, they were both used, and one was more effective But which one? In this time period, Absolutism was the best nominate of government, because it was effective and worked for the spate. In an Absolutism government, or a Monarchy, it was believed the abilitys worked with God, and He bestowed them with the power to be queen mole rat.In Document Two, ability James said, Kings are not only Gods lieutenants upon humankind But even by God himself they are c wholeed gods This is because the large number believed Kings rescue powers similar to Gods. Kings can create and destroy Can judge, simply are not judged Give life or send death. The people honestly believed because of this, they worked together with God. Their teamwork with God is why Kings were accepted by t he people, and why Absolutism was accepted as well.Related article Political Parties are Pillars of DemocracyKings used fear to gain control over the people, which is why they didnt fight against it. Machiavelli wrote in The Prince that a prince needs to be feared by the people Not loved and well liked. He would be incapable of macrocosm able to hold power over the people. If there wasnt a King, then there would be no control in the government. throng would be deciding everything for themselves, and it would end in disaster.The King/ Prince kept them in line, and the people didnt revolt. The head alone has the right to deliberate and decide, and the functions of all the another(prenominal) members consist only in carrying out the commands breachn to them King Louis XIV said that the King is the only person able to give the right orders, and make the right decisions. Everyone else was there to follow through on what he said. The interest of the state must come before the individ ual.The King was the only person capable of making sure the right decisions were made, and that the other members carried out the commands. So as you can see, Absolutism would win against Democracy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth centuries. It was more efficient, and worked well for them. The Kings had the power, and everyone was content with how things were array up. The people felt like this was how it ought to be, and it was. That is why Absolutism is the best form of government in this time period.

No comments:

Post a Comment