'Term Paper Social Work Ethics\r'

'Scenario star babble outs or so a single unemployed m other(a) of twain children who is thinking roughly having an abortion. She decides to build up an appointment with a mixer thespian close to it, however that mixer thespian decides that it’s non in the trounce c be of the customer, doesn’t c atomic number 18 ab come to the fore her wants and exertion force her a church pamphlet. salutary aside I collide with that on that point is a broadcast infr functionion, as a affectionate prole sensation should never speak of their hold beliefs and values when be pass offning on base with a leaf node. A amicable executeer should incessantly put what the client wants, within reason, first, as an act of self-determi rural bea for the client.The misdemeanour that I fix in the commandment of Ethics is the third rule â€Å" business to node”, specialized(prenominal) exclusivelyy looking at the sub- normals 3. 1 and 3. 4. 3. 1 Speak s of how College phalluss must â€Å" propose clients with accurate and sodding(a) discipline regarding the extent, nature and limitations of severally service operational to them” (pg. 11 regulation of Ethics). As a fraction of the College, we as loving histrions vanquish to a indebtedness to leave all resources use suit suitable to a client, unconstipated if it may non agree with our own in- someone values, attitudes and beliefs.I also intrust that we are prudent to provide accurate information; as a loving prole I would non turn away a client looking for resources and tell her to go to a church, specialally my own church, and to attendk paragon and for deliverness for thinking of abortion. I think it is outstanding to deal with for each one situation without each transcendental agendas and to look for the best possible outcome for the detail clients requests. 3. 4 Discusses how College members â€Å"do non discriminate against each(p renominal) angiotensin-converting enzyme base on race, religion, political affiliation, national origin etc…” (pg. 11, figure of Ethics).I think this was grab as a sub-principle as it speaks of how this mixer proletarian in the scenario brings in their own personal values, attitudes and beliefs and uses them against the client percolateking overlord help. I desire it is a lay usurpation of one’s religion and rights as a person. As a well-disposed actor, I would welcome communicate to Mrs. Tremblay thoroughly to make true that this is what she wants, as it is a permanent decisiveness and I would want to make sure that this decision was do purely from her decision and non based on what I piss to say. I would have given Mrs.Tremblay resources that are available that she may have wanted, such as hospitals, back off groups, counselor run etc, and head as allow Mrs. Tremblay have it off that if she ever needs extra backup that I would be availabl e with a non-judg psychic ear. Scenario twain speaks of how Mr. smith ol detailory sensations â€Å"blue” and see’s a tender actor in therapy, however that societal histrion tells Mr. metal histrion that he/she is vary in Mental wellness, and diagnoses Mr. smith with a depressive episode of bipolar Affective Disorder, and tells the client to start group therapy and control a workweek vacation to help lenify the symptoms.From reviewing the shimmy, it would have to depend on whether or non this well-disposed doer has a doctors degree full stop in amicable Work to be able to diagnose the client or non (as mentioned in the foot none from the Advertising principle) however from reading the text, I liveliness as though this genial Worker opines that he/she has just specialise in the knit of Mental Health, and not earned a doctorate in the field. I found that the misdemeanor happened nether atomic number 42 principle of â€Å"Competence and Integ rity”, down the stairs â€Å"Competence” with the sub-principles 2. . 1 and 2. 1. 3. 2. 1. 1 Discusses how â€Å"members are responsible for universe aware of the extent and parameters of their captain mountain chain” (pg. 5, regulation of Ethics). I rely that this is a direct infraction to what happened in the scenario. Since the kind Worker views that they are specialized in the field because it is an compass of design that they have worked in seeing m some(prenominal) patients â€Å" desire him”, however does not have the appropriate credentials, the function are beyond the member’s superior scope of practice.As a well-disposed Worker, and a member of the college, I would follow what the sub-principle says, and recommend for a contingent service, refer Mr. smith to other superiors who are able to legally diagnose Mr. Smith. 2. 1. 3 Discusses how â€Å"College members brinytain up-to-date hold upledge of policies, legislations p rograms and tell aparts related to the community in their area of practice” (pg. 6, Code of ethics). I think that this was an appropriate sub-principle as it describes that any member of the College should have full knowledge of their boundaries regarding what and what they are not allowed to controvert with clients.If I were the complaisant Worker in this scenario, I would have talked to Mr. Smith about how he is bungling, to try and see which professional I could recommend Mr. Smith to. I would place notes on what we talked about, such as Mr. Smith timbering withdrawn, poor appetite and loss of residuum and referred him to the professional I feel would fit Mr. Smith the best. I feel as though it would possibly be beneficial to continue seeing Mr. Smith to talk about how he is feeling, and create goals with him if he wanted to continue our services unitedly, however I would not ersonally diagnose Mr. Smith since I do not have a specific Doctorate in that area. Scena rio three discusses that an Aboriginal girl is having troubles at home, and was picked up and brought to the loving Workers office. The Social Worker feels participationed because the family is an â€Å" unquestionable” family in the community and that Social Worker cannot conceptualise that they are having family troubles. The Social Worker battle crys to let the family know that they have the child.With this vitrine, I see that thither is a slight of a fighting of interest and a judgment made seeing how the family is an â€Å"upstanding family” and that the Social Worker â€Å"cannot hope that they have having problems”. unless, I feel as though there wasn’t an infraction made seeing as the Social Worker on the moorage did not provide any services to the family. The Social Worker was the Worker on hand who initially greeted the child upon the drop-off, therefore has a Duty to Report. The principle that I found this case was a part of was princi ple of Integrity found infra the second principle, and the sub-principle is 2. . 1. 2. 2. 1 Speaks of how â€Å"College members do not carry in professional kindreds that constitute of a conflict of Interest… College members do not provide any professional service to a client” (pg. 6, Code of Ethics). Since the Social Worker only performed what their specific task was, and did not provide any professional service to that child, I deal that no infraction was created. If I were a Social Worker on Case, I would have called the family to let the child know that they were in my current care, however I would not engage in any professional consanguinitys since it is a conflict of interest.I would speak to another coworker or executive program to discuss this conflict, I would write a truncated case note describing that I was initially at in teach, that I could not continue my professional business as a Social Worker stick outable to the conflict of interest, and I wo uld write who I passed the case along too. I would also include a signature from my coworker as a trail in case the notes were ever subpoenaed to chat up. Scenario four discusses how a Social Worker is a full- sentence worker at a large family counseling agency and sustains a cloistered practice two evenings a week in his/her home office.Since the office has a sixer month waiting list for services, management asks you to take referrals in your private practice. In this case, there is no infraction. The Social Worker on case is evaluate referral’s from other employee’s which is mentioned in the Footnotes of the principle â€Å"Responsibility to Client” which mentions that â€Å"College members may accept referrals from their employees”(pg. 12 Code of Ethics). However, if the case was that the College member is â€Å"soliciting their employer’s clients for private practice” it would be a violation of the sub-principle 3. (pg. 11, Code of Ethics). If I were to be the Social Worker on hand in this case, I would make sure that the only clients I spoke to in foothold of coming into my private practice were strictly those who were referred to by other members of the College. I value and believe in the help that can be received when asked for, and by allowing other members to be part of this â€Å" dower deed” we are aiding in their own goals to be reached which helps one with their own values of self-determination. Scenario five discusses how Mr.Smith wants his Social Worker to write up an illness certificate so that he can have a fewer weeks off work, however Mr. Smith has no problems that would cut getting that time off work, but that Social Worker feels that a week off from work is acceptable for everybody in general. Reading through this I see right away that there is an infraction. at that place is no reason that Mr. Smith should get a week off work because he has made some shape up in therapy, and has been work well on his problems. I see the infraction under the Fourth principle of â€Å"Social Work and Social Service Work records” under the sub-principle 4. . 2. 4. 1. 2 Discusses how â€Å"College members do not make statements in the record… record, issue or sign a certificate, report or other document… that is cognize to be anomalous, misdirect or inaccurate”(pg. 15 Code of Ethics). In this case, the Social Worker feels as though Mr. Smith would benefit from having this week off and decides that it is a good idea, though Mr. Smith has no problems that would qualify him for this week off. In my own opinion, if I were the Social Worker in the case, I would continue to motivate Mr.Smith with his bare-ass found self-determination, especially when he is continuing to progress and complete goals that were initially set for him, why would a week off be beneficial. I feel as though that week off may set off a pattern that could petabyte him back to gr ound zero. I do not baring it appropriate to fill out false information, especially when it could be documented and subpoenaed back to court and could be shown that I went out of my way to favoritize a client because he has made some substantial work in therapy.I would continue to motivate, encourage and work alongside Mr. Smith until he no long-dated is in need of my services. Scenario six discuses the case of a Social Worker who workings in a private practice in a bucolic town of 5,000 and how a member of the same venire would like you to talk to his son since he is having behavior problems. I see this as an infraction of the second principle â€Å"Integrity” under the sub-principle 2. 2. 1, seeing as the Social Worker and the client know each other on personal terms, it is a direct conflict of interest. . 2. 1 Discusses how â€Å"College members do not engage in professional relationships that constitute a conflict of interest. where College members do not provide a professional service to a client”(pg. 6, Code of Ethics). In this instance, though the Social Worker in the case may be the only Social Worker in the town, he is still one of the few professionals, which means that there are other professionals that may assist his patron Barry and their child.The reason that I find it so important that we do not work with friends, acquaintances, or anyone of the sort that we know outside of our professional spectrum is biases. You cannot work with a client that you know because you pull up stakes not be able to take a look at the situation with a invention eye. As a side point of the sub-principle, it mentions that doing so, â€Å" vacates conflicts of interest and/or dual relationships with clients” (pg. 6, Code of Ethics), this means that as a Social Worker, having a professional relationship will never interfere with your personal one.It also discusses how â€Å"if the conflict of interest does arise, declaring the conflict of i nterest and pickings appropriate steps to address it could eliminate the conflict” (pg. 6, Code of Ethics), which means that discussing the conflict of interest could avoid the whole situation entirely. If I was the Social Worker working on this case, I would discuss with my friend Barry that there is a conflict of interest and I would not be able to fully give his son the appropriate counseling required because I would be waiver into the counseling sessions with a hidden agenda.Since the scenario discusses that the Social Worker is one of the few, I feel like I could still reference Barry’s son to other professionals that could still talk to him about the issues that are going on. Scenario seven discusses how there is a custody dispute where twain ex-spouses agree to pay 50% of the costs, however something arises where the economise pays his and her halves of the cheque and the kindly worker decides that since the bill has been paid out in full, there is no need fo r merely watchword about the money issues. From reading on about he case, I read that there is some definitely an infraction, under the principle â€Å"Fee’s” and the sub principle 6. 1. 6. 1 Discusses how â€Å"College members do not charge or accept any fee which is not fully disclosed” (pg. 29, Code of Ethics). From what I gather from the Scenario, the ex-wife was not aware of what the payment outcomes were, and since both spouses originally decided to each pay 50% of the costs I believe that by the Social Worker accepting the full bill and not discussing it with both parties, he is in situation prisonbreak one of the principle’s under the Code of Ethics.If I was the complaisant worker in this scenario, I would allow for both parties’ to be aware of what is casualty in the custody dispute, that way there if one party is not fully accepting of what is going on, we can go ahead to figure out what the next best step is. I believe that it is important to keep both sides completely tortuous in the case when it, at the end involves both ex-husband and ex-wife. I, as a Social Worker value honesty and view this scenario as not being fair to both parties involved.I also believe that if this instance were to be subpoenaed to court, and the wife finds out that the husband paid her half out, and it shows that I took that money, I feel as though my professional license could be jeopardized ascribable to the lack of honesty. Scenario eight discusses how Rachel has been referred to a mental health agency from a local nestling and Family Agency in a first nation community. Rachel has two children between the ages of 5 and 7and is trying to get out of an abuse relationship. Rachel’s sister-in- law of nature (husband’s sister) works for the Child and Family Center, and wants to find out the update on Rachel’s situation.Personally I found this to be a complicated situation, where I would definitely want to disc uss with other co-workers about their opinions for extra feedback of the best scenario. Right away I thought of the fact that Rachel’s kids are young, being 5 and 7, as abruptlyly as they enter a Shelter for Women passing abusive relations, Children and Family Services must be called as it is a Duty to Report. However, if Rachel’s sister in law was, for instance the woman who took the initial call, it would be in her best interest to follow the rules of it being a conflict of interest and to pass the call to another worker.In this scenario it also speaks to the fact that Rachel discloses that she is worried that Richard will find out where she is, which is when the Social Worker got a call from the sister-in-law asking for an update. This Social Worker is working in a Mental Health Agency, so the only outcome I can see it being appropriate would be to say that the children are no longer in your care, and that if there is any more details that need to be discussed, a confidentiality form must be gestural by all parties included and that information must be relayed to the worker in charge of the case.Therefore, I recognise that there was an infraction made regarding the fifth principle of confidentiality, under the sub-principles 5. 1 and 5. 3. 6. 5. 1 Discusses how â€Å"college members comply with relevant privacy and other legislations… use of disclosure of client information including personal information, unless otherwise permitted by law” (pg. 23, code of Ethics). This discusses how unless there was a consent signed by the parties involved that allows for members of the College to speak to each other, zipper should be said that can put any client in fortune.Therefore as mentioned earlier, unless there was a confidentiality form signed by all parties, and that Rachel’s sister in law was in fact on the case, this is a direct infraction. 5. 3. 6 Describes how â€Å"College members do not disclose the identity of and/o r information about a person who has consulted or kept up(p) them unless the person consents” (pg. 24, Code of Ethics). As mentioned earlier, I believe that no information should ever be relayed to any other member of parties involved due to the fact that it can be a direct get out of confidentiality.In my opinion, if information is ever let out to the victimize person, that client can be put in direct harm, and even possibly killed. As mentioned earlier, I would go about this by every sentry duty available to make sure that my client is in the best situation for safety. I would speak to other co-workers to get a second opinion and I would go about every safety premeditation from signing consent forms to discussing with those on the case from all parties involved about what is best for the client, since that is what my main precedence is.Scenario nine discusses how a Registered Social Worker with a Master’s degree and 20 historic period in psychiatric settings ha s a 95% triumph rate in treating depression. Many clients tell the Social Worker that they are a Doctor because they believe strongly in the skills used. I found that this is an infraction as the Social Worker is not a registered Doctor and as a Social Worker should firmly state their position in the inform of Social Work. The Principles that I found the infractions under are â€Å"Advertising” and the sub-principles 7. 1. 6, 7. 3. 3. 7. 1. 6 States that embers â€Å"cannot claim a special value that is unsupported by professional or scientific evidence” (pg. 31, Code of Ethics). Personally I feel like the Social Worker in this scenario is telling his clients that by having a 95% succeeder rate and that many clients refer to the Social Worker as a â€Å"Doctor” when no doctorate degree was ever received is an infraction of that rule. The Social Worker should be firm and honest with the clients stating that he is not a Doctor, however they have specialized in the field for 20 years, creating a colossal rapport with clients among the community. . 3. 3 States firmly that â€Å"College members coiffe whenever possible, false, misleading, or inaccurate information regarding qualification or services”(Pg. 32, Code of Ethics). I believe that this was a main sub-principle that was being broken. As opposed to the social worker stating that they were in fact not a Doctor, nor did he have a doctorate’s degree, the Social Worker carried on and laughed about the comments being made.As mentioned earlier, the Social Worker involved should have mentioned to all clients traffic him â€Å"Doctor”, that he is in fact, just specialized in his field. As a Social Worker in this case, I would only mention what was known as true fact when it came time to speak to clients, if they assumed I was a doctor, I would correct them and state facts such as â€Å"No, not a Doctor, however, I have my masters in Social Work, and I’ve speci alized in the Mental Health field for over 20 years”.I believe that honesty is what is important when it comes down to making a rapport with clients, that it is important to me as a Social Worker to be aware of these types of infractions so that there is no gray area in our sessions together as client and Social Worker. Scenario ten speaks of a Social Worker who receives a call from Pat, a potential client, which turns out that the client cannot get services from you however you refer the client to other counseling agencies. Two and a half years later, the social worker meets Pat once again and agree things off, where a internal relationship begins.Personally, I do not see this as an infraction due to the principle of â€Å"Sexual Misconduct”, under the sub-principles 8. 8. However if circumstances were shorter and it had not been a year, this would be an infraction of 8. 6 due to the fact of the relationship starting line at time of referral. 8. 8 Discusses how â₠¬Å"sexual relationships between College members and clients whom the members have provided social work or social service work services are proscribed for a period of one (1) year succeeding(a) the termination of the professional relationship” (pg. 6 Code of Ethics). In my opinion, and from what I have read, the Social Worker and client discussed the situation briefly and two and a half years later have met up once again. I do not see that as a direct infraction, however if it had been short of a year, and the client had by chance worked with the Social Worker at hand to get help, there would be an infraction under the sub-principle 8. 6. 8. 6 Speaks of how â€Å"sexual relations between College members and clients at any time during the professional relationship are prohibited.College members do not have sexual relations with any person who they’ve had a professional relationship due to the risk of creating a conflict of interest” (pg. 35, Code of Ethics). Expl aining in fact that if Pat and the Social Worker did have a professional and Sexual relationship, they would be creating an infraction directly. As a Social Worker, I value, and believe that is it important to respect clients as people, and not take advantage of the vulnerability they may be liner once taking a step further to discuss deep rooted and personal issues with be, as a Social Worker.I believe that there is a rule placed for a reason and that it would not be fair to any people pursuance my own personal help to take advantage of their vulnerability (intentionally or not) and use it while having a professional relationship with the client as well. Scenario cardinal discusses how there is a Social Worker in an Aboriginal mental health agency, who has a specific client Mary Lou, who is about to terminate her treatment with the Social Worker since she has completed her goals. As a thank you gift, she has made a dream catcher for the Social Worker out of love and appreciati on.Personally I do not feel that there is any infraction in this case, seeing as it was not a sexual misconduct for Mary Lou to give the gift and for the Social Worker to accept it a â€Å"thank-you gift”. Just to be certain however, I would look at the principle â€Å"Relationship to Client” under the sub-principle 1. 7. 1. 7 Discusses how â€Å"College members employed by organizations maintain an awareness and consideration of the purpose, mandate and function of those organizations and how they may limit professional relationships with clients” (pg. , Code of Ethics). I believe that in this statement it displays that College members must keep their relationship in mind when working alongside with clients. I believe that there would be a world-shattering problem if the clients were offering us fee’s on the side, â€Å"tips” almost, or that the client has found an randy love for the worker, however this is not the case. As a Social Worker, I be lieve that there is nil better than knowing that one appreciates what you’ve done for them in terms of creating that rapport.I believe that there is a specific reason why we all chose to get into this program, and helping others is a major reason, if it wasn’t, why else would it be? I do not believe that there is anything handle with a gift of appreciation, especially one that demonstrates their culture. I value the rapport that we build with clients and the things we visualize from each of the cases that we work on we are able to learn and grow each time. Works Cited Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers. (2008). Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice Handbooks . Toronto : Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers.\r\n'