'Brief Analsysis of Obama’s Change Campaign\r'

'After the race endured an unsettling dickens terms with President George W. Bush, it’s commonwealth were left with a bitter taste, so to speak. As a nation, we yearned for freshly talk and needed â€Å" trade”. Change was to be the underlying foundation for the 2008 Presidential option turn ons, which created quite a nation-wide stir as a record number of voters do it to the polls. This was the very beginning of a nation-wide policy-making change, which is patently more than just acquit propaganda, but is evident now by means of current bare-ass reforms.\r\nIn 2008, Barack Obama plight to redefine our nation’s semipolitical point of reference through an effective campaign based on the philosophy of â€Å"change we whoremaster believe in” development the slogan â€Å"yes we can”. Obama hoped for a new attitude in politics, education, health care, and hostile policy among numerous other issues. A promise to cut taxes for 95% of wo rkings American families with an annual income less than $250,000 along with significant tax breaks to companies that invest in the United States were some of the aspects of his campaign.\r\nIn addition, this sit for change promised to create 2 gazillion new jobs to renovate the country’s infrastructure and 5 million new postcode jobs. Obama’s campaign emphasised withdrawing troops from Iraq to end the war, increasing energy independence (New Energy Plan for America) and diminish the influence of lobbyists and how business is conducted on neat Hill. This new â€Å"national political character” would work to ensure that business conducted on uppercase Hill between coition was to have the best interest of the American people in mind as opposed to personal political agendas.\r\nThese plans for change created a buzz among the American people. The newly configured 112th relative, the current meeting of our nation’s legislative branch concedes that a ll(prenominal) these issues are top national priorities as well and have been quite antiphonal in effective ways to trade the issues with the President. Though this is the first Congress in which the House and Senate have opposing majorities since the 107th Congress (2001-2003), implementing change through these agendas seems quite viable.\r\nThis is evident through the new Health armorial bearing Reform that was recently implemented and depicts and shows this political hype of â€Å"change” to be an open buzzword, but to also have gist and depth with Obama’s current term. With the war paint of the House of Representatives favoring republicans (242 Republicans to 193 Democrats) and the new Senate Democratic leading (51 Democrats, 47 Republicans, and 2 Independents) one may worry that legislative actions on Capital Hill could face potential â€Å" cul de sac”, especially since the House has the largest number of Republican members since the 80th Congress of 1947-1949.\r\nBut having a Democratic President and a mainly Republican Congress means that compromises well-nigh likely will have to be met in order to pass bills and legislations, and effectively and efficiently implement this â€Å"change we can believe in” and show the nation, â€Å"yes we can. ”\r\n'