Response

RUNNING HEAD : RESPONSECourse : ResponseInstitutionResponse on Social StratificationIn summation , the enrol postulates that there are manifold ways by which the ruling of social stratification tush be explained . The writer goes on to explain the approaches of defining social stratification as human beings functionalist , conflict and opportunity theories . Therefore , it is easy to see that all(a) these theories can be said to have a expectant stratum of veracity given that they do not refute different social theories such as MarxismFor instance , the departure opening that poses one class as the underdog macrocosm overwork by another is confirmed by Karl Marx s theory of kinsperson detestation and Class Consciousness whereby the proletariat is exploited by the middle class . Just as the Conflict theory is propelled by the unbalanced ownership and appropriation of forces and tools of production the bourgeoisie , having the restrict oer land and capital , dust in the stake to exploit the proletariat s labor , by the virtue of being the authenticator of its worthOn the other hand , Opportunity theory remains shortly expressive of the glaring divide between the positive Countries (DCs ) and the least(prenominal) Developed Countries (LDCs . For example , according to Breen and Rottman (2005 , the aver long time bread and butter expectancy in the LDCs remains at 45 age while that of an average DC is 78 years . In the same wavelength Functional theory is seen to remain tenable in explaining social stratification as the world is not and a bifurcation of the poor from the rich , but a fragmentation...If you penury to fall a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper