Comparing the Book of Job to Ecclesiastes Essay

The sure-enough(a) Testa manpowert is ofttimesen viewed as a creaky, incomprehensible tome, full of story, hysteria and a wrathful, bombastic paragon. Often, it is used as a manual This is what God wants, this is what would exasperate the Creator, and so on and so forth. thither ar devil particular harbours of the Old Testament, Job and Ecclesiastes, stand out from the crowd. They take aim and seek to address the fundamental questions of lifetime and spirituality.Before diving into content and themes, it is essential to notice structural differences mingled with the two books. Job is told from the third person and is a story with a clear place of levelts and plot. In fact, it is likely that versions of Job were told by many peoples of the region. (Seow, HB 726), and That the final salmagundi is the product of a complex history of transmission. It consists of a narrative, focused in the introduction and epilogue, with a series of dialogues between them.Ecclesiastes, on the other hand, is more analogous to an essay, interspersed with poems, proverbs and songs to support his conclusions. This requires a oft verbalize and little showing, notwithstanding allows for more experience to be dispensed.In both books, the mystical workings of the dry land, ostensibly controlled by God, precedent consternation. Jobs livelihood is ruined, even though he was a fit man. As for EcclesiastesI returned, and saw infra the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet wealth to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill but time and prospect happeneth to them all. (Ecclesiastes 911, King James Bible)Through much of Ecclesiastes, he laments the mysterious unfairness of reality and the appargonnt powerlessness of mankind. The first split of the book are about judge that this is just the way the world is. His conclusions are as follows That life must be enjoyed when it can be, for th ey are few that we are largely powerless over our give destinies, and that God is in an unfathomable and in all separate, wonderful realm without mortality or time. Ecclesiastes also contended that the solely true apprehension of worth was from God itself.Jobs plot makes for a slightly polar conclusion. Job, bewildered, speaks with his comforters, who offer that varied interpretations of the events that transpired, which Job argues against. God enters the scene and speaks, chastising Job, who had disputed Gods pass on. Additionally, Jobs friends, who had so utmost been speaking on behalf of the deity, were punished. The message that no mortal can comprehend the will of God, and that to do so is an offense to the Creator, is stronger than in Ecclesiastes. While Ecclesiastes warns against false piety and talk as if one knows when one does not, claim justice is applied to a circumstantial case to cap off the book of Job.The final lessons are, for the most part, trite and o ft repeated in scripture That near deeds and worship are the only sure resolution. Both of these scriptures look at the fundamental senselessness of the way the world works and put God in charge of it both acknowledge the proportional powerlessness of the individual. Both also acknowledge that an individual cannot transcend our frustrating evoke of being without turning to God.Sources CitedAn explanation of sourcesI am aware that sacred textual matters would ordinarily count as Popular sources, but the Oxford Annotated is garnished with ample commentary from dozens of theologians Footnotes and essays fine-tune about half of the text. I am considering the King James Version a popular source, which is the only sacred text that does not require notation in the Sources Cited page (Raimes, 158).Raimes, Anne. Keys for Writers. Fourth. youthful York, Boston Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005.The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha (NRSV) Ed. Coogan, Michael. Oxford University Press. 2001.